Haulr
Use cases

Where leakage actually hides.

Four high-volume spend categories where AI agents reliably surface recoverable overpayments. Pick one to start — typically your largest or most complex vendor.

/01 · freight

Freight

Carrier invoicing is dense, accessorial-heavy, and changes weekly. Most leakage hides in fuel, detention, and lane mismatches.

Typical recovery range
1.5 – 4%of gross freight spend

Leakage patterns

  • Fuel surcharges applied above the contracted FSC matrix
  • Detention and dwell billed in excess of agreed thresholds
  • Lane rates outside the contracted lane matrix or zone
  • Reweigh / reclass adjustments without supporting documentation
  • Accessorials billed twice (e.g. liftgate + inside delivery on the same stop)
What you provide
  • Carrier invoices (PDF / EDI 210)
  • Active rate confirmation or contract
  • Most recent fuel index
What you get back
  • Vendor-level recovery summary
  • Line-item evidence with contract clause
  • Recommended dispute language
/02 · staffing

Staffing

Agency timesheets, bill-rate matrices, and overtime multipliers create dozens of small mistakes that compound across pay periods.

Typical recovery range
2 – 5%of contingent labor spend

Leakage patterns

  • Bill rates above the master service agreement
  • Overtime billed at incorrect multipliers (1.5x vs 2x rules)
  • Markup creep on long-tenure assignments past tier thresholds
  • Holiday / shift premiums applied outside eligible windows
  • Unbilled rebates or volume discounts on quarterly true-ups
What you provide
  • Agency invoices and timesheets
  • MSA + active rate card
  • Headcount / req-level mapping if available
What you get back
  • Agency-level recovery summary
  • Per-worker evidence trail
  • Reusable rate-validation template
/03 · facilities

Facilities

Janitorial, security, landscaping, and maintenance contracts are scope-heavy. Out-of-scope work routinely gets absorbed without change orders.

Typical recovery range
1 – 3%of facilities services spend

Leakage patterns

  • Service hours billed for shifts that were unstaffed
  • Out-of-scope work absorbed without an executed change order
  • Material markups above the contracted cap
  • Square-footage assumptions that no longer match the site
  • Equipment or consumable charges already included in the base fee
What you provide
  • Vendor invoices + supporting tickets
  • Master service agreement and pricing exhibits
  • Site list with square footage
What you get back
  • Site-level recovery summary
  • Hour-by-hour reconciliation
  • Renewal benchmark recommendations
/04 · materials

Materials

MRO and indirect materials sit across hundreds of suppliers. Tier pricing, freight terms, and obsolete catalogs are the usual culprits.

Typical recovery range
1 – 3%of indirect materials spend

Leakage patterns

  • Tier or volume pricing not honored at qualifying volumes
  • Obsolete part numbers invoiced at premium replacement rates
  • FOB conflicts causing freight to be charged twice
  • Hazmat and handling fees outside the contracted schedule
  • Quarterly rebates and growth incentives not credited back
What you provide
  • Supplier invoices (top 10 by spend)
  • Pricing agreement / contracted catalog
  • PO history if available
What you get back
  • Supplier-level recovery summary
  • SKU-level price-deviation evidence
  • Forward-looking pricing watchlist

Start with the category that costs you most.

One vendor. Two weeks. Evidence-first findings before any fee.